Dragon Ball Z Uncensored

Ryoko's Biatch · (Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:40 pm)

Hey, Pat.

Fuck you.

Mautty · (Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:40 pm)

Yeah my bad anyway its this movie woth my $9.50 or should I wait and rent it for a buck at the drug store.

GimpMask · (Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:43 pm)

Hey, Andre.

You're black

GimpMask · (Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:49 pm)

ANYWAY, this is the only movie all year that appears like it could be fun

I still stead-fastly refuse to go to a movie heater though

Mautty · (Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:49 pm)

I bet it would be hot!

GimpMask · (Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 pm)

Sporkism · (Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:27 pm)

This movie stops being entertaining as soon as the title screen pops up.

Genius returns in bits throughout the movie, but they'd be better served as youtube clips.

The one-liners aren't clever or funny, Monica Bellucci is hot but otherwise a non-entity, and Paul Giamatti is unbearable as always. The carrot gimmick gets old fast. And above all else, baby-centric movies have an inherent terribleness about them that can't be ignored.

The only reason I don't regret having seen this in theaters is because of the umbilical cord explosion.

Mautty · (Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:40 pm)

Yeah but have a vagina. So who cares what you think. AM I RIGHT GUYS.

Sporkism · (Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:46 pm)

No, I'm pretty much right about this one.

Nickass · (Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:06 pm)

C'mon, have a vagina.

Mautty · (Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:20 pm)

Ryoko's Biatch · (Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:03 pm)

If the fact that the plot is worthless and shouldn't exist bothers you, then you're not watching this movie for the right reasons.

Sporkism · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:08 pm)

Of course it's worthless. So why bother putting any of it in at all? Either you have a ridiculous, retarded, non-stop action movie, or you have a movie that is actually good but also contains awesome action. I have no time for the gray areas!

My complaint here is that there is NOT ENOUGH action. There are MOMENTS, yes, but everything in between these occasional scenes is ESPECIALLY annoying - not just because it isn't "good."

The first 10 minutes or whatever of the movie set a standard that the rest of the movie can't keep up with. It's an incredibly awesome 10 minutes, of course, but my point is that there were so many other opportunities for similarly awesome ACTION that are wasted on retarded filler and Paul Giamatti insisting on things like "having lines" and "not dying instantly." I don't care if the story is dumb, but Shoot em Up pretends like people should care about it. So what if your baby was stillborn, you worthless cunt? What a stupid scene.

All I'm saying is that this movie should not be touted as flawless entertainment, or near-perfect entertainment, or even 'nowhere near perfect but still highly enjoyable' entertainment. I was pretty bored by the end of the movie.

Rice · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:09 pm)

Gosh. I enjoyed the movie a great deal. I thought it was very entertaining and I didn't think the movie demanded anything else out of the viewer.

GimpMask · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:09 pm)

http://leatheroaks.org/Rubber/index.html

Sporkism · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:11 pm)

PAUL GIAMATTI IS SO FUCKING TERRIBLE.

WHY DON'T ANY OF YOU UNDERSTAND THIS.

His presence automatically takes it down AT LEAST a full star.

Let My Love Open The Door · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:14 pm)

They're about to crack, Morgan!

Theldorrin · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:20 pm)

Did you not like American Splendor?

Let My Love Open The Door · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:21 pm)

I didn't really like American Splendor.

Nickass · (Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:48 pm)

That was pretty much the best movie ever!