Dragon Ball Z Uncensored

[Sporkism]

Paul is a faggot octopus!
_________________


@}-,-'- *~*~* Member of the FTU Elegant Tea Party Society *~*~* -'-,-{@

[Seru]

Yaaooouch! Seafood soup!

[Servbot]

Paul sashimi.

[MADali]

"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"

[johnbuisthegreat]

oh what a day in sports.

[Jason]

Some other oracles did not fare so well in the World Cup. The animals at the Chemnitz Zoo in Germany were wrong on all of Germany's group-stage games, with Leon the porcupine picking Australia, Petty the pygmy hippopotamus spurning Serbia's apple-topped pile of hay, Jimmy the Peruvian guinea-pig and Anton the tamarin eating a raisin representing Ghana. Mani the Parakeet of Singapore,[57][58] Octopus Pauline of Holland,[59] Octopus Xiaoge of Qingdao China,[60] Chimpanzee Pino and African Red River Hog Apfelsin in Tallinn zoo Estonia[61] picked the Netherlands to win the final.[62] Crocodile Harry of Australia picked Spain to win.[63]
_________________
Last edited by God on Fri Apr 05, 33 4:00 am; edited 1 time in total

[My Head Hurts 90]

Monkeys are no match for cephalopod intelligence.

[ALDP]

Hey MADali just so you know, that doesn't mean jackshit.

[MADali]

I copied the wrong part actually. I meant to ctrl-c ctrl p this:

ssuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]

[Jason]

"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
_________________
Last edited by God on Fri Apr 05, 33 4:00 am; edited 1 time in total

[ALDP]

"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"

[johnbuisthegreat]

"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"

[Fagzilla]

"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"

[Magic Juan]

"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, "Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"

[Fagzilla]

Also, ctrl p

[Action Hank]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huNOsFQa_Ns&feature=fvw

[8 bit orgy]

Paul is an inter-dimensional being with origins dating back to Pre-Noah Flood Peru.

[ALDP]

Hey retard, the word is "antediluvian."

[johnbuisthegreat]

FTU
Eff Tee You.
Fuck The Universe.

FAQFAQ SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist UsergroupsUsergroups
ProfileProfile You have no new messagesYou have no new messages Log out [ johnbuisthegreat ]Log out [ johnbuisthegreat ]

Paul is dead


Post new topic Reply to topic Eff Tee You. Forum Index -> Freddie's Dead: The Final Nightmare
Author Message
Sporkism
It's funny that I have a job executing cats and dogs, considering that I AM A WHORE WHO FUCKS FOR MONEY
Joined: 05 Jan 2007
Posts: 4886
(Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:07 pm)
Reply


Post Paul is dead
Paul is a faggot octopus!
_________________


@}-,-'- *~*~* Member of the FTU Elegant Tea Party Society *~*~* -'-,-{@
Seru
Custom titles are for heroes, like me.
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 9445
(Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:11 pm)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
Yaaooouch! Seafood soup!
_________________
Servbot
Overrated faggot
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 8663
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:11 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
Paul sashimi.
MADali
I am a girl on the internet. Yes, I said it. A girl on the internet. There really are quite a few of us. I can type. I can play games with the best of you. And you, my friend, are about to get owned by a girl.
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 5312
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:46 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
johnbuisthegreat
www.soldierofcock.com
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 3729
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:10 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead Edit/Delete this post
oh what a day in sports.
Jason
At ten I shaved my head and tried to be a monk, I thought the older women would like me if I did.
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 5917
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:15 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
Some other oracles did not fare so well in the World Cup. The animals at the Chemnitz Zoo in Germany were wrong on all of Germany's group-stage games, with Leon the porcupine picking Australia, Petty the pygmy hippopotamus spurning Serbia's apple-topped pile of hay, Jimmy the Peruvian guinea-pig and Anton the tamarin eating a raisin representing Ghana. Mani the Parakeet of Singapore,[57][58] Octopus Pauline of Holland,[59] Octopus Xiaoge of Qingdao China,[60] Chimpanzee Pino and African Red River Hog Apfelsin in Tallinn zoo Estonia[61] picked the Netherlands to win the final.[62] Crocodile Harry of Australia picked Spain to win.[63]
_________________
Weirdness, your personal God.
My Head Hurts 90
Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 3013
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:05 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
Monkeys are no match for cephalopod intelligence.
ALDP
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 1627
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:24 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
Hey MADali just so you know, that doesn't mean jackshit.
MADali
I am a girl on the internet. Yes, I said it. A girl on the internet. There really are quite a few of us. I can type. I can play games with the best of you. And you, my friend, are about to get owned by a girl.
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 5312
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:21 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
I copied the wrong part actually. I meant to ctrl-c ctrl p this:

ssuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]
Jason
At ten I shaved my head and tried to be a monk, I thought the older women would like me if I did.
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 5917
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:58 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
_________________
Weirdness, your personal God.
ALDP
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 1627
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:25 am)
Reply


Post Re: Paul is dead
"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
johnbuisthegreat
www.soldierofcock.com
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 3729
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:25 am)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead Edit/Delete this post
"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
Fagzilla
I wonder if spiders can feel love.
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 6805
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:41 pm)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead
"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
Magic Juan
Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 7720
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:22 pm)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead
"Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, "Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair independent coin flips, the probability of at least 12 successful predictions from 14 attempts is p = 0.0065, or 0.65%.[43] (154 to 1). And the probability of his 8 successful World Cup predictions out of 8 attempts is 1/28 = 0.0039, or 0.39% [44] (256 to 1). The first three matches were in the group stage where the outcome could have been a win, loss, or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"or draw, resulting in a less than 50% probability of getting the result correct. Assuming a probability of 33.3% in 6 out of 14 matches instead, the probability for 12 or more successes can be simulated numerically to be 0.11% (corresponding to 3.2 standard deviations in gaussian statistics).[45]"
Fagzilla
I wonder if spiders can feel love.
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 6805
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:42 pm)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead
Also, ctrl p
Action Hank
Yes, I fart dicks. Dicks actually come out of my anus when I fart.
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 7715
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:13 pm)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huNOsFQa_Ns&feature=fvw
8 bit orgy
There's no fucking way Obama will win FL and NV. There's like to democrats to speak of anywhere here. Even the younger adults are voting for McCain. Honestly, I never even met a democrat in Florida, period.
Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 2544
(Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:56 pm)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead
Paul is an inter-dimensional being with origins dating back to Pre-Noah Flood Peru.
ALDP
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 1627
(Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:50 am)
Reply


New post Re: Paul is dead
Hey retard, the word is "antediluvian."

[Mike Dunn]

Oh, I see what you did there.