Dragon Ball Z Uncensored

[Seru]

I really need to get a haughty laugh personal picture.

[Fagzilla]

"A death by natural causes, as recorded by coroners and on death certificates and associated documents, is one that is primarily attributed to natural agents: usually an illness or an internal malfunction of the body."

Cancer absolutely qualifies as "an illness" that is caused by an "internal malfunction of the body."

Yeah, people usually just say "cancer", but it would be no less bullshitty to say "natural causes," considering that "natural causes" is itself kind of a bullshit term.

THE POINT IS, cancer (disease in general), doesn't fall under the umbrella of "unnatural death."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unnatural_death

[Fagzilla]

VICTORY FROM THE JAWS OF DEFEAT: SNATCHED.

[Yogurtman]

Wrong.

[Fagzilla]

My soul is already weary at the prospect of reading ALDP's response to all of this.

[BigJoeMex]

Look at this guy, pretending we care about what he thinks or has to say!

[Seru]

And for future reference, professional journalists do not consider Wikipedia to be a viable or trustworthy source for fact checking. Please cite a medical journal during our inevitable rematch.

[Seru]

More like Wiki Needy a more stringent and meticulous method of filtering false facts!

[Seru]

All my niggers at the Canadian Press say hooooo!

[Fagzilla]

If that's journalism's attitude, then journalism is woefully out of date.

That perception of Wikipedia is so 2003.

Wikipedia may have been dodgy early on, but NOBODY is more stringent and obsessive than those cocksuckers nowadays.

Go try editing something if you don't believe me!

You will be dogpiled within minutes by the most pedantic fucks you've ever seen.

OH GOD HOW I HATE WIKIPEDIA

[Seru]

Of course it is, that's why journalism is a dead industry. People are uneducated louts that prefer the shoddily written blatherings of some nimrod texting from a street corner because waiting for a granite solid, fact checked, masterfully crafted retelling written by a trained professional is just unacceptable in our mile a second world. Yay, every idiot has his say, regardless of how laden it is with rhetoric or bias! Truth is now only relative to timeliness! Slack-jawed computer jockeys are vigilantly monitoring a global collection of textual sewage! Bravo, society, you have the most technologically advanced bathroom wall to scrawl on. For a good time call MY DICK.

[Seru]

And I'm a graphic designer now. Journalism is...overrated.

[MADali]

Wikipedia has higher journalist standard than actual journalism. If I was a teacher, I'd prefer my students to source from wikipedia rather than some random article in New York Times or whatever.

[Seru]

Fantastic. Way to be, hoss.

[Ryoko's Biatch]

Except the Wikipedia Nazis won't let you edit an article unless you use the New York Times as a source ...

[BigJoeMex]

MADAli's and Chris' posts could be the best troll in a while, but I wouldn't count on it!

[MADali]

But while Wikipedia uses New York as a source, it usually counterbalances with a million more, with its nerds challenging every viewpoint by bringing up hundreds of other sources and constantly refusing anything to be biased.

While some asshole who is writing an article will talk about how Ahmadenijad wants to wipe out Israel from the map, even though he never fucking said that!!!!

[Seru]

Heh heh, what a scamp.

[Seru]

A-DOR-A-BLE.

[BigJoeMex]

iran