Author           |
Message |
Fagzilla Got lost in another dimension for a couple months. But seriously, we will actually update the site within the next couple of days. http://www.bandzwiki.com/ Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 10111 (Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:06 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Um... don't you mean "differently abled?" |
|
Magic Juan Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 8709 (Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:07 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
No, I mean crippled faggots. |
|
Fagzilla Got lost in another dimension for a couple months. But seriously, we will actually update the site within the next couple of days. http://www.bandzwiki.com/ Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 10111 (Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:09 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Um... don't you mean "crippled nigger-faggots?" |
|
Magic Juan Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 8709 (Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:11 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
I don't know if that means you think that I'm trying to be "mountain dew xxxtreme" about hating a certain category of people, when I'm really just talking about hating crippled faggots. |
|
Magic Juan Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 8709 (Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:12 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
I'm not sure if you'll get it, but I did something there. |
|
Fagzilla Got lost in another dimension for a couple months. But seriously, we will actually update the site within the next couple of days. http://www.bandzwiki.com/ Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 10111 (Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:15 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
This is getting complex! |
|
Potatoes Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 3039 (Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:16 am) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Vinny is right. |
|
cloacal kiss Bearded and bald baby is the worst of all worlds Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 2039 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:31 am) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Oh man, people are really going to bring up me not talking about this stuff 4 or 5 years ago or whenever I was posting in high school? I had no interest in talking about any of this online. I wasn't really interested in discussing this stuff with anyone! Yeah, I call people faggots and always called people faggots and niggers and nigger faggots. That has nothing to do with what I actually believe about nigger faggots. The fact that I never brought up feminism before was because I had no interest in stirring shit over it here and the reason I never brought up racism before is for the same reason although also because I never witnessed so much awkward "I'm not racist, but" shit here before. I've posted here off and on since I was 16, it is ridiculous to think my personality and attitude toward posting wouldn't change in any of my half year or more absences regardless of how easy that makes it to categorically dismiss everything I say.
Anyways Rice your entire argument seems to be that women are biologically equipped to bear children. It is easy to see how some traditional roles formed from that but if they aren't essential (Which in their strict forms they aren't) then they shouldn't be forced onto women the way they are. Morgan, you hate people and you do most of your socializing on the internet. You are sort of the profile for somebody who would not respect a woman choosing to reproduce at all, let alone in place of a career. You're nuts if you think having kids is looked down on by any meaningful chunk of the population. Anyways as for TV portraying women favorably, it's completely retarded to point out unfavorable male stereotypes. No fat kid in the world is afraid he's going to grow up to be a clumsy inept policeman. The range of positive male characters is orders of magnitude wider than that of female characters. There are tons of awesome fat male characters, for instance, but who is an awesome fat female character? Roseanne?? |
|
YES Ask me about nation, culture, religion, gender, sexuality, and identity in general being anachronisms from a more vulgar and primitive past. Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 6090 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:08 am) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
ALDP, the whole basis of your argument (and a principle problem I have with feminism) is its based on arguments that society and men are INNATELY sexist, that women are INNATELY oppressed unless we do something about it. Which may be true, but is not that good of an argument.
If there is a completely brutal frontier village with total freedom, chances are women tend towards traditional roles, even if some are whores or even dominant alpha-ladies.
The whole problem with feminism in the western world is that they aim to INSTITUTIONALIZE women's rights, as opposed to just live and let live (which is what freedom really is, in some opinions).
In a word, Women have not been "forced" in to their roles to the extent feminists claim they have. That is my, and probably everyone elses critique of 2nd wave feminism.
And American women in particular can just plain fuck themselves, they have done their part in making American the worst of both worlds when it comes to both conservatism and gender |
|
YES Ask me about nation, culture, religion, gender, sexuality, and identity in general being anachronisms from a more vulgar and primitive past. Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 6090 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:15 am) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Maybe I am a little harsh on the feminists, but it does get difficult at times to respect them in an American context. there was a time when I hated them more the neo-cons, and I guess there is a tad bit of residue there. |
|
Sporkism It's funny that I have a job executing cats and dogs, considering that I AM A WHORE WHO FUCKS FOR MONEY Joined: 05 Jan 2007 Posts: 5369 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:11 am) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
I've never said that having children is looked down upon by any significant portion of the population.
I've said that perhaps women who just want to stay home and take care of their kids instead of also having a job might be looked down upon in a society where women are expected to work like everyone else.
"Adjusting to a New Self Image
On top of all this, new stay-at-home moms will probably feel a torrent of conflicting emotions as they create new identities for themselves. Unconsciously, they may have attached a good deal of their self worth to the careers they left behind. Curious strangers who question, 'So, what do you do?' may unconsciously trigger a new stay-at-home mom’s fight-flight instinct."
"On one very important thing both 85% of stay-at-home moms and 83% of working moms agree. Both say stay-at-home moms don’t get the respect they deserve."
So, I would say there has definitely been a shift of opinion about the more traditional female roles. _________________
@}-,-'- *~*~* Member of the FTU Elegant Tea Party Society *~*~* -'-,-{@ |
|
Magic Juan Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Posts: 8709 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:11 am) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
I have sex with women and they bear my seed. |
|
ALDP Joined: 25 Jul 2009 Posts: 4412 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:20 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Outland, you're a retard. Women haven't been forced into their roles because their roles are millions of years old and the most likely default in a completely brutal frontier village? Feminism seeks to institutionalize women's rights in order to correct centuries of institutionalized sexism. What the hell are you even talking about?
My focus isn't even on institutions which are probably at least superficially equal in most cases. The problem is that American society is extremely sexist which makes the question of a woman's role a lot more difficult to resolve.
And Morgan, there has been a shift in some people's sensibilities but I think the dominant experience is still being asked by various relatives when you're going to get married, have kids, etc. |
|
Vinny [00:10] How can you get an erect dick into your own ass? Joined: 16 Jan 2007 Posts: 5181 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:39 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Uh, men can deadlift heavier shit than women can. Explain that. _________________
 |
|
Ryoko's Biatch Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 9256 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:56 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Uh, men can fuck each other in the ass. Explain that? |
|
Theldorrin Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 19724 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:45 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
There are a lot of fat male characters on TV but they're not positive role models.
Stay-at-home moms get more respect than they deserve, since what they do is usually absurdly easy. |
|
Theldorrin Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 19724 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:52 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
There are very few positive role models on TV at all, I suppose. I guess Star Trek, Angela Lansbury on Murder, She Wrote, and a very small number of characters on medical dramas. |
|
Ryoko's Biatch Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 9256 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:56 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
Greg House |
|
Theldorrin Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 19724 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:59 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
No, he's a drug addict. The only positive things about him are his intelligence and atheism. |
|
Sporkism It's funny that I have a job executing cats and dogs, considering that I AM A WHORE WHO FUCKS FOR MONEY Joined: 05 Jan 2007 Posts: 5369 (Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:56 pm) Reply

|
Re: anthropology chapter 3 in the first fucking textbook |
|
|
I think it's more of a double standard, really. People expect women to have kids AND keep up with some sort of career. _________________
@}-,-'- *~*~* Member of the FTU Elegant Tea Party Society *~*~* -'-,-{@ |
|
|