Dragon Ball Z Uncensored

SuperPsaturn · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 6:37 pm)

Yeah I don't even feel like trying with that title. I have no idea what this is though from the commercials and no research it seems like a gayer Battle Royal. Still the main chick is kind of attractive to me so is anybody going to go see this SHIT on Friday? What's it even about?!

GimpMask · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:14 pm)

You're no me.

Really. I guess I should feel unique its impossible to do a quality Iimitation of myself. Whereas there are a million psaturns. Either that IR you been smoking more than pot. You get all neurotoxic with that adderall old man?

Magic Juan · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:19 pm)

Everyone is talking about going to see this and having read the book but like, am I supposed to keep up with reading child science fiction?

ALDP · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:27 pm)

Gimp Mask, Psaturn is posting one new thread a day, hoping that something will catch people's interest and get them posting. He isn't spamming, which is what you do. So yeah, he's no you!

GimpMask · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:30 pm)

Replying to new threads with content is not spamming.

Your arbitrary definition lacks sensible application

GimpMask · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:32 pm)

Or rather your arbitrary definition is senseles

ALDP · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:35 pm)

You didn't post content, you posted more annoying bullshit to make the thread about you.

Action Hank · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:36 pm)

The book is good.

GimpMask · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:37 pm)

Ryoko's Biatch · (Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:02 pm)

Is this actually good or should I proceed with my life?

Seru · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:15 am)

Consider the source before you proceed. You're also about ten years older than the target audience. Read it and you're basically a pedophile.

SuperPsaturn · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:43 am)

Yeah okay, anime boy!!!!

Roy · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:13 am)

Never read it. My intuition tells me that it's less shitty than Twilight, but not as good as Harry Potter. It's got 100% on Rotten Tomatoes so far, but I can't even trust film crickets. I recently watched every Rocky movie for the first time, and I thought Rocky V was pretty good. Imagine my shock when I discovered that it is the most reviled Rocky movie of them all! How in the hell is Rocky Balboa more critically acclaimed? It's basically the exact same movie as Rocky V, except shittier in every single way. It's better because he fights in a boxing ring after a training montage?

I'm about to watch The Godfather Part III for the first time too. I predict a quality movie!

GimpMask · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:04 am)

Rocky 5 is extremely bad PAY ROY. I mean, REALLLLY bad.

I watched it on beta and I thought it would be cooler that way, but no

Roy · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:35 am)

Oh, my prediction was wrong. I enjoyed the cousincest though!

GimpMask · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:47 am)

I've always heard about why Godfather movies are good, but nobody has ever given a real reason. It is a Guinea media conspiracy

ALDP · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:43 am)

Thanks, Roy. As ghosts would have it, I was talking in the chat the other day about how I'm gonna watch Godfather 3 and how I bet it's a great movie, but now I feel like that can probably wait.

ALDP · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:44 am)

Wikipedia says Coppola says it should be considered an epilogue rather than another sequel, does that change how you feel about it at all?

Ryoko's Biatch · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:04 am)

It's still a piece of shit.

Roy · (Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:33 am)

I didn't think I and II were masterpieces either, but yeah, III is the weakest. I don't see how it being an epilogue makes any difference. I'd like it more if they actually showed the cousins fucking instead of just implying it. I still got a chub-on when they made out though!

Doesn't anybody else like Rocky V?! I'm okay with people hating it, as long as they admit Rocky Balboa was worse.

Now that we're on the subject of woppy cinema ... The Dollars trilogy. I hated A Fistful of Dollars, and almost didn't watch For a Few Dollars More and The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly because of that, but they were amazing! Why is there such a mind boggling difference in quality? I got confused about Lee Van Cleef though. I thought in Good/Bad/Ugly, he was still Mortimer from the previous movie, and inexplicably turned to the dark side, but he was actually a completely different character. Why'd they give him the exact same outfit and mustache? He even smokes from a pipe again!